It's Small-Stock Sweet Spot Time!

BEING STREET SMART

by Sy Harding 

The Truth About Election Years!

December 16, 2011.

Next year is a Presidential election year, and the stock market is almost always positive in election years. Right? At least that assurance has been a supposed truism for many decades, and repeated as fact each year in numerous interviews and financial columns.

And it makes sense.

After all, the Four-Year Presidential Cycle has an unusually consistent pattern of the market experiencing most of its serious corrections in the first two years of a Presidential term and most often making a substantial recovery in the last two years. The pattern was interrupted when the financial crisis hit and 2007 and 2008, the last two years of the Bush Administration, experienced a serious bear market. But the circumstances were unusual, and the few times over the last hundred years that the cycle did not hold true to form did not affect the long-term percentage of the cycle.

It also makes sense that election years would be positive as each Administration pulls out all the stops to make sure the economy and stock market are positive when re-election time arrives.

But it’s just not true. I studied all election years since 1920, and here’s how the Dow fared in each. I included whether it was a Republican or a Democrat in the White House in case that made a difference.

 

 

 

Dow

1920

Wilson

Dem

-32.9%

1924

Coolidge

Rep

+26.2%

1928

Coolidge

Rep

+48.2%

1932

Hoover

Rep

-23.1%

1936

Roosevelt

Dem

+26.1%

1940

Roosevelt

Dem

-12.7%

1944

Roosevelt

Dem

+12.1%

1948

Truman

Dem

-2.1%

1952

Truman

Dem

+8.4%

1956

Eisenhower

Rep

+2.3%

1960

Eisenhower

Rep

-9.3%

1964

Johnson

Dem

+14.6%

1968

Johnson

Dem

+4.3%

1972

Nixon

Rep

+14.6%

1976

Ford

Rep

+17.9%

1980

Carter

Dem

+14.9%

1984

Reagan

Rep

-3.7%

1988

Reagan

Rep

+11.9%

1992

Bush Sr.

Rep

+4.2%

1996

Clinton

Dem

+26.0%

2000

Clinton

Dem

-6.2%

2004

Bush Jr

Rep

+3.2%

2008

Bush Jr.

Rep

-33.8%

 

Of the 23 election years 15 were positive, or 66.7%.

However, ignoring whether or not they were elections years, over those 91 years 62 were positive anyway, or 68%.

Conclusion: The market was up in 68% of years overall, and 67% in election years. So, whether it was an election year or not had no effect on the market’s performance.

Of the 23 election years, the market was up 63.3% of the years when a Democrat was in the White House, and 66.7% when it was a Republican.

Conclusion: It makes no difference which party is in the White House at election time.

So it seems investors will not be able to rely on an election year ‘indicator’ to guide them through the market next year.

Coming next is my study of whether an election year has any influence on the market’s annual seasonality of usually making its best gains in the winter months and experiencing most of its serious corrections in the summer months.

Stay tuned! 

    

 Sy Harding is president of Asset Management Research Corp, and editor of www.StreetSmartReport.com, and the free market blog, www.streetsmartpost.com.

Editors: You are welcome to quote from this article, or use it in its entirety, in your publication or on your website, as long as the credit in the above paragraph is also included. Readers are also welcome to e-mail, or print and snail-mail it to friends.

These reports reflect our opinions and are based on our best judgment, but no warranty is given or implied as to their accuracy. Past performance does not guarantee future performance.

Back to the Top    Home    Subscribe to RSS Feed


Copyright © 2011 Asset Management Research Corp. -- ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

footer
footer