![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
STREET
SMART SCHOOL
|
![]() |
|---|---|---|
A service of streetsmartreport.com |
||
Library Home Street Smart Report Home
BEING STREET SMART
by Sy Harding
PREFERRING A DEPRESSION? February 20, 2009.
For
several weeks I've been writing about the need for the government's
financial stimulus efforts to be supplemented by efforts to instill some degree
of confidence in severely depressed consumers and investors.
I
was thinking in terms of President Reagan's strategy upon inheriting the
similar economic collapse of the 1970's. He provided financial stimulus,
including huge increases in defense spending, some of it wasted, such as
launching the costly but never completed 'Star Wars' anti-missile system,
etc., but created jobs. He augmented the spending with upbeat assurances about
the greatness of America, and how the country would soon begin to pull out of
the seemingly impossible mess. Similarly President Bush provided a large
stimulus package after the terrorist attacks in 2001, and supplemented it with
confidence-building speeches about how Americans should get out of their
terrorist-inspired fear modes and spend, "to show these terrorists who would
tear down our economic system that they won't succeed." Both times the 'jaw-boning' was as important as the financial stimulus in lifting the
confidence and determination of consumers and investors.
My
columns along those lines resulted in an avalanche of criticism, the mildest
of which asked how I could advocate that the government attempt to brainwash
the population, should attempt to hide the facts of how serious the situation
is. That is not what I said. What I said was that for two years consumers have
been fed a steady diet of doom and gloom, are well aware of the seriousness of
the situation, and it's time for the government's financial stimulus efforts
to be supplemented by efforts to instill some degree of confidence in the
nation's future.
If
that is brainwashing, then the problems were created in the first place by
someone brainwashing people into thinking they could safely buy a house they
couldn't afford because home prices would just keep rising forever.
Meanwhile,
I have been saying since the real estate bubble burst and collapsed the economy,
that the economy cannot recover until the housing industry recovers.
So
I was disappointed that stimulus efforts had to begin with the rescue of banks
and the financial system, then moved to bailout efforts for the auto industry.
I
was delighted that rescue efforts have finally begun to focus on the housing
industry, where home foreclosures are accelerating, sending home prices and
buyer confidence even deeper into gloom and doom, and sinking the economy even
faster. But I have been surprised that rescuing the housing industry, which
mostly affects the folks on Main Street, apparently has even more opposition
than bailing out Wall Street and the auto-industry.
Just
how unpopular the plan is was revealed by CNBC reporter Rick Santelli on
Thursday.
By
now most of the country, if not the world, is aware that Santelli, noted for his
daily rants from the Chicago Board of Trade about what he believes to be wrong
with the country, took aim at the Administration's housing rescue bill. During
his rant he shouted this question to traders on the floor of the CBT, "How
many of you want to pay for your neighbor's mortgage because he can't pay
the bills? Raise your hands!" Amidst yells of agreement from the traders Santelli turned to the camera and shouted
"Are you listening, Mr. President?"
A
landslide of approving e-mails apparently encouraged Santelli to announce that
he would organize a "Chicago Tea Party" demonstration, a revolution he
called it.
He
surely hit a nerve with his opinion that those who are losing their homes and
jobs should not be bailed out by those who are in good shape on their homes,
finances, and jobs, with calls of 'Santelli for Senate', and 'Santelli for
President' spreading over the Internet.
It
does have its amusing aspects, given that the economic mess was created by the
financial industry, in part by its creation of high-risk derivatives, including
mortgage-backed securities, and the wild leverage provided to hedge funds.
Santelli became a CNBC reporter in June, 1999, almost at the top of the stock
market bubble, leaving his position as a vice-president at Sanwa Futures LLC,
where he handled institutional trading and hedge fund accounts. Prior to that,
he served as managing director of the Derivatives Products Group of Geldermann
Inc.
And
now he is the hero of those who feel abused by the collapse of the house of
cards created by the questionable products and greed of Wall Street firms?
But
of more concern to me is the apparent majority opinion that "I don't care if
the value of my home keeps dropping due to foreclosures on my street. I didn't
make any mistakes, and I don't want my tax money used to bail out those who
are in over their heads. I don't want the banks saved with my tax dollars. Let
then go bankrupt. I don't want the auto-makers bailed out. They deserve to go
bankrupt. I don't care if it causes the whole country to fall into the next
Great Depression."
I
suppose the same argument could be made about giving blood, or contributing to
food banks, unemployment insurance, cancer research, the Red Cross, education.
Hey, I didn't get sick, I didn't lose my job. I've got my education.
Do
they even realize how much worse a depression is than a recession?
The
Bush Administration tried to get things turned around by spending a few trillion
dollars of taxpayer money, and the new Administration is trying. The results of
those efforts won't be known for awhile. But both administrations ran into a
lot of opposition from those who would rather let those with problems (banks,
auto-makers and millions of individuals) go bankrupt and see if the system can
recover on its own or not. One often repeated additional reason is that it's
unfair to saddle future generations with larger deficits.
If
a few years from now the economy has worsened into a decades-long global
depression, thanks in part to the unwillingness of even the folks on Main Street
to unite in the common goal of trying to rescue the economy, because their money
might go to someone less fortunate, who will they look back and blame that on?
And how much worse off will their children be than if the national debt is
stretched even further now?
In
his rant Santelli asked, "Are you listening, Mr. President?"
I ask, "Are you listening America?"
Sy
Harding is President of Asset Management Research Corp., and publisher of the
financial website www.StreetSmartReport.com,
and the free blog www.SyHardingblog.com.
He also authored the timely 1999 book Riding the Bear - How to Prosper in the
Coming Bear Market, and 2007's Beating the Market the Easy Way - Seasonal
Strategies that Double the Market!
Back to the Top Library Home Street Smart Report Home Sy's Free Daily Blog.
