![]() |
BEING STREET SMART by Sy Harding Gold Has Lost Its Glitter Again! After experiencing a remarkable bull market run from $250 an
ounce in 2001 to $1,900 an ounce last summer, gold has not had an easy time of
it since. Three times it plunged as much as 19%, and rallied back,
only to run into resistance each time at $1,800. It is potentially doing so
again.
That’s probably puzzling investors who have been seeing so
many big-name analysts and fund-managers become very bullish for gold, with
reasoning that seems sound. The latest Reuters poll shows precious metals analysts have
become more bullish for gold and silver than they have been in several months. Even technical analysis was backing the bullish outlook. My
technical indicators triggered a sell signal on February 19, almost exactly at
that peak, but had me and my subscribers back on a buy signal in mid-August and
back into a 20% position in the gold etf GLD. The case for gold, at least from the fundamental side, still
sounds bullish. As Ray Dalio, chief investment officer at Bridgewater
Associates, the world’s largest macro hedge fund recently told CNBC viewers,
“We have a situation where there is too
much debt, which leads to central banks printing money, which is bullish for
gold.” Other analysts add that fears of the looming ‘fiscal cliff’
in the U.S., and possibility that rating agencies will downgrade the credit
rating of the U.S. again, are positives for gold over the next several months. There is also the expectation that the Fed’s latest QE3
program will be inflationary, and gold is the traditional hedge against
inflation. Then there is the history that gold often (but not always)
moves opposite to the U.S. dollar, and the dollar has been in a decided decline
since July.
So what is going on that gold’s latest rally attempt again
ran into resistance at $1,800 an ounce, triggered a sell signal on technical
indicators like the Stochastic Oscillator, and gold has plunged $70 an ounce
over the last couple of weeks?
I’m still long-term bullish on gold and its problem is
probably just that sentiment for gold became over-heated and needs to cool down
some. For instance, according to Reuters, gold’s spike-up rally
since August had investors piling into gold etfs at such a pace it forced the
etf’s to raise their holdings of bullion to a record 2,681 metric tonnes. And CFTC data shows hedge funds have raised their gold
futures holdings to their highest levels in almost 14 months. The extreme
bullish sentiment for gold could also be seen in the excitement for it on the
financial TV shows. So perhaps gold’s problem will be relatively short-term,
perhaps a pullback to the previous support at its 30-week m.a., just to get the
sentiment cooled off some before the upside resumes. But with the 30-week m.a. at $1,650 an ounce, even that
would be a $140 an ounce decline from its recent high, not something I’m willing
to endure. And given the way gold’s long bull market potentially topped
out last year and has a potential triple-top in place, maybe there’s something
more fundamental going on. Could gold possibly be saying that the ‘fiscal cliff’ will
be successfully resolved? Or that central banks are going to aggressively sell
gold from their reserves to raise cash to help with their debt loads? Or that
the global economic slowdown will continue and result in deflationary pressure
rather than rising inflation? I don’t
have the answer to those questions. So I suggest simply following the charts and
letting the indicators tell us when the downside momentum and money flow
reverses to the upside enough to trigger our next buy signal.
Sy Harding is president of Asset Management Research Corp, and editor of www.StreetSmartReport.com, and the free market blog, www.streetsmartpost.com. He can also be followed on Twitter @streetsmartpost Editors: You are welcome to quote from this article, or use it in its entirety, in your publication or on your website, as long as the credit in the above paragraph is also included. We would also appreciate it if readers would 're-tweet' it on Twitter, 'like it' on Facebook, or e-mail it to friends. These reports reflect our opinions and are based on our best judgment, but no warranty is given or implied as to their accuracy. Past performance does not guarantee future performance. Back to the Top Home Subscribe to RSS Feed
|
![]() |